page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116 page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
< prev - next > Environment and adaptation to climate change mainstreeming climate change adaptation in agricultural extranison (Printable PDF)
MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
Slide 13
LEARNING USING THE FFS EXTENSION APPROACH
A GROUP OF 25-30 FARMERS AFFECTED AND
INTERESTED IN SOLVING A PRODUCTION
CONSTRAINT FORM A FFS.
TOGETHER WITH EXTENSION, FARMERS DESIGN
FIELD EXPERIMENTS TO COMPARE OPTIONS WITH
THEIR PRACTICE
FARMERS SELECT A HOST FARMER AND A SITE
FARMERS MEET AT AGREED PERIODS DETERMINED
BY NEED: - CROP AGE AND GROWTH STAGES.
1(8- 2 MEETINGS PER SEASON)
Slide 16
2012
DATA TO BE COLLECTED AND ANALYSED BY
FARMERS TO COMPARE THE PERFORAMNCE OF
CROPS UNDER DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT
REGIMES
%- GE EMERGENCE
LEAF COLOUR
PLANT HEIGHT
NUMBER OF TILLERS
NUMBER OF FRUITING BODIES
LENGTH, CIRCUMFERENCE OF COB/ PANICLE
LABOUR FOR ALL OPERATIONS
Slide 14
IN SUB GROUPS FARMERS ANALYSE THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A CROP AND ITS
ENVIRONMENT.
FARMERS MEASURE AND RECORD PARAMETERS
THAT WOULD BRING ABOUT DIFFERENCES IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE TREATMENTS.
IN THEIR SUBGROUPS THE FARMERS ANALYSE
THE DATA, NOTING DIFFERENCES IN
PERFORMANCES AND THE REASONS FOR THE
DIFFERENCES
Slide 17
WEED SPECTRUM AND DENSITY
DISEASE AND PEST DYNAMICS
YIELDS
RETURNS PER DOLLAR INVESTED IN THE
DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES (Cost Benefit Analysis
ETC
Slide 15
FARMERS MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION- IF
THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR CROP,
WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO TO MANAGE IT WELL?
SUBGROUPS PRESENT THEIR FINDINGS TO THE
FFS.
THE FFS ARRIVES AT A CONSENSUS AS TO WHAT
MANAGEMENT DECISION TO IMPLEMENT.
Slide 18
A FARMER WHO HAS ANALYSED THE DIFFERENCES IN
THE PERFOMANCE OF THE DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES
THROUGH OUT THE CROP’S LIFE CYCLE CAN MAKE AN
INFORMED DECISION ON ADAPTATION AND OR
ADOPTION
THEY ARE EXPERTS IN THE SUBJECT AS THEY WOULD
HAVE LEARNT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF ALL
THE GROWTH STAGES OF THE CROP.
WHEN FARMERS, RESEARCHERS AND EXTENSIONISTS
ALL CONTRIBUTE THEIR SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND
SKILLS AND EXPERIMENT JOINTLY OPTIMIASATION
OF YIELDS AND MAXIMISATION OF PROFITS IS
ACHIEVED WITHIN A VERY SHORT SPACE OF TIME
A Training Manual on Use of Climate Information and Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment for
Agricultural Extension Staff in Zimbabwe
Page 115